Tone

In the beginning of the first chapter, Ernesto Guevara states how he and his friend decided to leave home to travel around South America. In the journal, Ernesto Guevara states his reasons to leave; he explains that he wanted to escape from all the medical school stuff, the hospitals, the exams, etc. He realizes that he was much of a dreamer and could not be left at home doing what the rest of the people were doing. This excerpt helps people get a better understanding of him, because it tells you how everything started. It explains why he left Argentina to travel and how he met with his partner, Fidel Castro, and led the Cuban Revolution.
When Ernesto Guevara talks about the two commandments for traveling and the whole purpose of leaving, he mentions how there can be endless trips. This describes who Ernesto Guevara is because it separates him from the rest of people. His ideals and his dreams define who he is and why he left home to pursue his goals to, revolutionize places such as Cuba. This reflects his overall tone because from the excerpt you can tell that there was a plan all along inside him.
(This was a Do Now from a long time ago, but I didn't post it because I was having trouble connecting to the site at school.)

Separate Ways

When Che leaves Argentina, he is an idealistic dreamer, hoping to unite the South Americans as one “America”. Through his journey with his friend Alberto, he comes in close contact with widespread poverty, famine, and hunger. From his journey, he realizes that his goal is to help the people by making everyone equal. He sees that communism is the way to everything and starts to revolutionize Cuba. When Che first meets Castro and decides to work with him hand to hand, he doesn’t realize their differences in political ideals. However throughout their years together, they eventually separate. Guevara states during his speech that his goal is to help the sick and the poor so that they may prosper.
(I had trouble connecting my blog at school, so I'm posting the Do Now now)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdo6FwAPyng

"The Experts"

When Che and his friend are named “the experts” they travel around the different towns in Chile curing and helping out the sick and poor. This relates a lot to what Che does later on his career, because his whole goal is to spread the common wealth. Because he sees people suffer from poverty, he spends his later years trying to start a revolution to help the South American people. For this reason, he gets separated with Fidel Castro; Unlike Fidel Castro, Che believed in pure Marxist ideals.
(I was unable to connect to my blog so I'm posting my Do Now now)

Connection to the article

It is interesting how the article and Che’s story are alike because the basic background story is pretty much the same. The article and Che have similar circumstances that relate the two together. Although the two situations are both based on the political struggle between two nations it is different because of the problems concerning the political struggle. I feel like this can be considered similar because it deals with the whole political disagreement and the involvement of the American troops in South America.
(I had trouble connecting to my blog so I am posting the Do Now now)

Thesis

Ernesto Guevara dreamed of becoming the “problem solver”. But through his foolish mistakes, he failed to help South America and became a problem himself.
(I had trouble connecting to my blog, so I am posting the Do Now now)

Motorcycle Diaries-Peru

While in Peru, Che makes a visit to San Pablo, the leper island. Before Che leaves, he makes a long speech about his goals and ideals. He writes in his journal that the audience accepted the speech with great applause. Do you really think that they did or do you think that he was exaggerating?
In my perspective, I think Che might have been exaggerating because the audience could have had different political ideals. Not everyone in San Pablo believed in Communism and could have had disagreed with him. Furthermore, I think Che was making a fool of himself because he believed that he could be the hero/savior of the people of South America through his own personal efforts.
(I had trouble connecting to my blog, so I am posting my Do Now now)

My Ideals

I believe that there are some ideals that transcend our ability to define them. For example, I would define goodness and truth as the ultimate way to all things. I think that being untruthful or lying to make another feel better makes situation worse because it always leads to a bigger problem. Although the truth may hurt some at times, it is the best way because it deals with sincerity and honesty. Because our intentions are authentic, I feel that it is right to tell the truth even at times when it may hurt. Additionally, I feel that it is ok to make mistakes because it makes us better people. Although the mistakes may have consequences for the individual and others around him/her at a moment in time, I feel that one can never go wrong in trying hard. I believe that you ca always gain from your mistakes.

(I had trouble connecting to my blog, so I am posting the Do Now now)

Che Blog

After watching the video and the documentary of Che, I feel that no one is specifically responsible for his death. However, I do feel that the Bolivian government and Castro had some contribution or influence on his death because of what they had done to him. When Castro read the farewell letter to the people of Cuba, I think that (although Castro didn’t kill him physically) Fidel Castro left Che powerless, preventing him from coming back to Cuba. Because Castro felt that Che was getting on his political pathway, I think he felt it was best to keep Che away from Cuba as soon possible so he made an attempt to abandon him. I think that is why the audience can tell the awkwardness between the two when they are at a meeting after Che's speech on the Tri-continental. Because Castro had a different philosophy from Che, I think he may have contributed to Che's death.
(I had trouble connecting to my blog, so I am posting the Do Now now)

Ending (1)

“Phileas Fogg had won his wager, and had made his journey around the world in eighty days. What had he really gained by all this trouble? What had he brought back from this long and weary journey? Nothing, say you? Perhaps so, nothing but a charming woman, who, strange as it may appear, made him the happiest of men.”(Verne 245).

I did not really like the last chapter of the novel, because the story suddenly ended without any clarifications and solutions. When detective Fix found out that the actual robber was caught three days ago, Fogg is released from prison, and he suddenly finds out that he had actually made it back to England in time. I felt that the ending came too sudden, following Fogg and Aouda’s decision to get married the next day. Furthermore, I felt that the ending was unclear, because the International Date Line explanation was did not really make sense. Because the author forgot to take account of the first time the characters crossed the Pacific, it seemed unclear as to how long the journey had actually taken place. I am expecting that the author was trying to end the novel with a happy ending, and that is why he decided to end the story so suddenly by making Fogg win the bet.

Aouda

Before: “You are four minutes slow. No matter; it’s enough to mention the error. Now from this moment, twenty-nine minutes after eleven, A.M., this Wednesday, October 2nd, you are in my service.” (Verne 13)
After: “When he opened them again, I love you, he said, simply. Yes, by all that is holiest, I love you, and I am entirely yours.” (Verne 236).

In the beginning of the novel, Fogg is very cold and somewhat calculating. After meeting Aouda however, he begins to change in personality. Although I realized that Fogg had changed a lot after meeting Aouda, I was very surprised when Fogg confessed his love to her. I was also surprised by how quickly he had made the decision to marry her, agreeing to marry her the very next day. The old Phileas Fogg would have never let such things, because he required everything to be superhumanly prompt and regular.

International Date Line- 80 or 81 day? (2)

“The cause of the error is very simple. Phileas Fogg had, without suspecting it, gained one day on his journey, and this merely because he had traveled constantly eastward; he would, on the contrary, have lost a day, had he gone in the opposite direction- that is, westward.” (Verne 243).

The ending was very unclear to me. When Phileas Fogg and Passepartout left England and headed towards Hong Kong, they had initially crossed the Pacific without accounting for the International Date Line. For this reason, there is no need to “take a day away”. If the two characters had taken account of the International Date Line when they first crossed the Pacific, they would have lost a day and then gained back a day when they reached New York. Thus, this would have no effect on the date and would mean that Phileas Fogg had returned to England in 81 days. Another part I thought was confusing was how Passepartout was keeping a close eye on the date and the time. In the novel the narrator states that Passepartout kept the London time and did not bother to change his watch. “You have kept London time, which is two hours behind that of Suez. You ought to regulate your watch at noon in each country.” “I! Regulate my watch! Never!” “Well, then, it will not agree with the sun.”(Verne 44).

Symbolism of the Novel

Phileas Fogg, the main character, is a reserved and punctual Englishman. He lives a regularized life, following nothing but his daily schedule. Because of this reason, the only social life he has is at the Reform Club. After an argument with another reform club member, he is convinced that he can travel around the world within eighty days. With his valet, Passepartout, he decides to leave his home and embark a journey around the world. Although Fogg tries to follow a specific schedule, he is slowed down, visiting different places and meeting different people. Although he is limited in time and is unable to follow his regularized lifestyle, Fogg ends up gaining more from his busy life than his solitary and punctual life. Through the novel, I think the author is trying to imply that keeping everything in control can sometimes make things harder for people, because it takes away the fun. I think the author is trying to teach the audience that you should let time pass, not try to control it.

True Motives (7)

My predictions from Prompt 6 were partly incorrect. Detective Fix was not sent or paid by any member of the Reform Club. However I was right in predicting that he was trying to find the culprit so that he can get a percentage of the stolen money as an award. I was also right in predicting that Fix did not truly want to solve the case, because further in the novel the author reveals that Fix was merely pretending to go around the world to chase Phileas Fogg when his real purpose was to flee the law in England. At the end, Fix gets nothing that he wanted. When Fogg, Passepartout, Aouda, and Fix arrive in Liverpool, Fogg is arrested but set free when it is found that the actual robber was caught three days ago. So Fix ends up getting no money and is back in England, unable to free himself

Transition (3)

“The project was a bold one, full of difficulty, perhaps impracticable. Mr. Fogg was going to risk life, or at least liberty, and therefore the success of his tour. But he did not hesitate, and he found in Sir Francis Cromarty an enthusiastic ally.” (Verne 77).

In the beginning of the novel, the narrator describes Mr. Fogg as a very reserved and punctual man. He is impeccable in his manners and is described as living a regularized life. He “required to be almost superhumanly prompt and regular. On this very 2d of October he had dismissed James Forster, because that luckless youth had brought him shaving water at eighty0four degrees Fahrenheit instead of eighty-six; and he was awaiting his successor, who was due at the house between eleven and half-past” (Verne 12). Throughout the novel however, the readers see a change in Mr. Fogg’s character as he becomes more rational. For example, during the journey he comes across a young Parsi woman named Aouda, who is being dragged to a sanctuary to be sacrificed by Brhamins. When Passepartout tells him to save Aouda, he decides to devote his spare twelve hours to help free her from the sati ceremony. Due to the incident, he loses the two days that he had gained earlier but does regret it. Furthermore, he decides to take Aouda with him when he finds out that her family has moved and is no longer in Hong Kong. He feels it is uncaring just to leave her behind in Hong Kong by herself and decides to take her to England, where he can support her with his wealth.

Clues (6)

“Consul, said he, I have no longer any doubt. I have spotted my man. He passes himself off as an eccentric who is going around the world in eighty days. Send a telegram to London for a warrant of arrest to be dispatched instantly to Bombay, take passage on board the Mongolia.” (Verne 46).

From what I have read so far, detective Fix seems like a fool. Without a thorough investigation, he is suspecting that the main character, Mr. Fogg, is the bank robber. I feel that there is something about the detective, because he seems like he isn’t trying really hard to solve the case. From my perspective, it seems like he is rather trying to grab anyone that fits the description of the robber and accusing them of the crime so that he can get in recognition and possibly some money. I also think that detective Fix may have been paid to interfere in Mr. Fogg’s journey, because it is highly likely that another member from the Reform club is trying to make Fogg lose the bet.

Detective Fix and Che Guevara (10)

After reading the novel, Around the world in 80 days, I thought that detective Fix was very much alike Ernesto Guevara. When detective Fix suspects Mr. Fogg as the bank robber just by matching him to the description of the robber, I felt that Fix was acting very foolishly like Guevara was in his earlier years. Because of Fix’s mistake in suspecting Mr. Fogg as the criminal, he ends up delaying the whole voyage and makes many obstacles for Mr. Fogg, Passepartout, and Aouda. Similarly in Motorcycle Diaries, Ernesto Guevara puts his troops at risk and ends up killing himself when he tries to start another revolution in Bolivia, believing that he could become a hero and savior of the people of South America.

Jules Verne (12)

In the novel, Around the World in Eighty Days, author Jules Verne includes descriptions of various rail and shipping lines that were newly built during the technological innovations of nineteenth century. From reading the novel and after researching about the author’s history, I think the narrator might have accepted some companies’ requests to include their names and information onto the book. I would have omitted such information, because I think it distracted readers from the main plot. I feel that the author could have included more necessary information, such as a brief background history or description of the country (setting), because I think it would have helped readers follow through the novel.

Age of Exploration (8)

The technological innovations of the 19th century started the age of exploration. With the completion of the first Transcontinental Railroad in the United Sated and the opening of the Suez Canal, it may it possible for people to travel around the world. The theme of this novel is the newborn possibility and freedom that rose from the technological boom. For this reason, the author tries to imply that nothing is impossible if you try. For instance, despite all of detective Fix’s plans that end up interfering the journey, Mr. Fogg ends up making it back to Liverpool in time.

Around the World In Eighty Days

Around the World in Eighty Days was first published in 1873 by author Jules Verne.